Doom10 Forum: Digital Video Discussion
September 09, 2010, 12:06:06 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: Of course it's better, it's one more. Read the rules!
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: How to interpret the SSIM  (Read 793 times)
pelle412
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 2


View Profile
« on: March 09, 2010, 05:21:17 AM »

I'm an x264 enthusiast and I'm wondering about the utility of the SSIM metric. I understand that some options such as psy-rd doesn't help SSIM but makes the picture look better (for certain material). I don't have particularly good eyes and the only way I compare encodes is by watching them at full frame rate on my 19" PC monitor. One of my blurays is Batman Begins. A straight crf 21 tune film encode of a 1280x528 version yielded ~1400 kbit/s with a SSIM of 0.9839. To me it looks like the source, so I should be happy right? I also suspect if I do crf 22 it may end up with a SSIM still > 0.98.

Since I don't have a very large TV to test my encodes on, I'm concerned that I may accept an encode as "good" and later having to redo it because I got myself a TV that shows what it really looks like. Based on your experience, is there a SSIM value that regardless of resulting bitrate one can consider the encode as "good enough"? The viewing medium for me will likely be a 55-65" LCD TV sometime in the future. I know that SSIM 0.98 is roughly 50% better than 0.97, mathematically speaking anyway.

Any insights from you experienced encoders out there with big-a** TVs?
Logged
Dark Shikari
x264 developer
Administrator
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 465


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: March 09, 2010, 06:16:05 AM »

SSIM is not that useful, but as a threshold it's even less useful.  I have sources that look nearly perfect at 0.90 SSIM and I have sources that look like crap at 0.99 SSIM.

Among film content, it probably depends heavily on the properties of the grain.
Logged

Esurnir
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 20


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: March 09, 2010, 03:15:16 PM »

White or whole wheat? What kind of properties if I may ask?
Logged
chengbin
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 9


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: March 09, 2010, 03:52:56 PM »

For film >0.98 is excellent.

When DS is referring to sources that look crap on 0.99, he meant anime. Anime require something like at least 0.996 to look good.

SSIM isn't a very good as a threshold. Always use your eyes to judge.
Logged
Dark Shikari
x264 developer
Administrator
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 465


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: March 09, 2010, 07:03:24 PM »

For film >0.98 is excellent.

When DS is referring to sources that look crap on 0.99, he meant anime. Anime require something like at least 0.996 to look good.
Not true at all.  I was referring to cases where the primary artifacts consisted of blocking in flat areas, something that SSIM completely does not capture.
Logged

Dstln
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 29


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: March 10, 2010, 08:50:26 AM »

If you're not sure if you can tell a difference on your smaller monitor, put your face right up there and check lol.

Being right up close to a 19" monitor would show more to someone with nearsightedness than being across the room from a 60" >_>

And yeah basically, SSIM means SOMETHING and would generally go up and down with bitrate but going for any certain number is counterproductive.
Logged
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!